Wonderschool ยท New Mexico ECECDhild Care

Trust the handoff

Objective

Let providers claim and maintain their own listing in a few self-serve steps, so the state offloads upkeep to the people closest to the truth.

My Role

Product & Interaction Design

Flow Design

Prototyping

Context

Surface: Provider acquisition

Prototype: nm-claim-flow

Tool: Figma

The problem

New Mexico's Early Care and Education Department is standing up a public child care finder for its Universal Child Care program. The state already holds registry data on thousands of programs, but it goes stale the moment it's published, hours change, availability shifts, directors come and go. Asking ECECD staff to maintain it by hand doesn't scale.

The existing claim process made this worse. A provider would click "Claim this listing" on their white-labeled New Mexico finder page and land straight in Wonderschool's generic account creation, no bespoke design, no explanation. Providers got confused about why a state-branded product had suddenly become a completely different one, and that confusion showed up as drop-off right at the moment we most needed them to convert.

The handoff itself isn't going away. Wonderschool's core product doesn't yet support white-labeling (that's on the roadmap), so claiming a listing will always mean stepping from the state-branded finder into Wonderschool proper. The fix wasn't to disguise that shift, it was to introduce it on purpose, with a moment that names both brands and explains what's about to happen before the provider is asked to create an account.

The hypothesis: if providers can claim their own listing through a co-branded experience that explains the handoff instead of hiding it, the state offloads maintenance to the people closest to the truth, and providers gain a reason to keep their page current, because it's now theirs.

What I designed

A complete claim flow, from a family-facing finder all the way to a claimed account, with one deliberate twist: the same flow runs in two brandings side by side, the NM ECECD version (teal, state logo, "contact ECECD" recovery) and the Wonderschool marketplace version (Wonderschool blue, "create a new listing" recovery).

The bet on one flow

Running both brandings in one prototype pressure-tested whether a single flow could serve a state partner and the national marketplace without forking the design. Because the versions share structure and diverge only in tokens, copy, and recovery routing, the prototype is itself the argument that one flow can serve both audiences.

1
Finder landing

A real-feeling search results page, filter pills, map, "showing X of Y programs," a Universal Child Care banner. Unclaimed programs surface a "Claim this listing" call to action right where a provider recognizes their own center.

2
Find your program

Live typeahead across name, city, license number, director, address, and zip. Forgiving on purpose, a director shouldn't need to know exactly how the state spelled their business name.

3
Verify ownership

The trust gate, and the key UX decision: a two-field check with a confidence cascade. A matching license number alone is enough, but a weak or mistyped license can be rescued by an address match. One rigid field would lock out legitimate owners over a typo; "either path works" keeps the gate meaningful without making it brittle.

4
Create account

Name, live-formatted phone, email, password with inline strength guidance. Email-already-taken is handled gracefully with a "log in instead" off-ramp rather than a dead end.

5
Claimed landing

Intentionally a clean stub, a handoff seam for the post-claim dashboard that comes next.

Co-branded modal reading 'New Mexico Child Care Finder is powered by Wonderschool,' explaining the account handoff before it happens
The moment that introduces Wonderschool by name, before the provider is asked to create an account, so the handoff is explained rather than discovered.
Find your program step of the claim flow, co-branded with the New Mexico Early Childhood logo Verify your program step, asking for license number or director email plus address
The co-branded claim flow itself: find the program, then verify ownership with the license number or director's email.

Craft decisions

Recovery paths are first-class

Every "we couldn't find / verify your program" state is context-aware: the NM flow points to ECECD contact info, the marketplace flow offers "create a new listing." Failure states are where claim flows usually leak users, so they got as much attention as the happy path.

Already-claimed isn't a wall

Already-claimed programs route to a "request to be added as staff" path, because the real-world case, a second director at the same center, deserves a door, not an error.

What's real vs. mocked

The branding, flow logic, fuzzy-matching rules, and recovery UX are the real deliverable. Program data, verification, and account creation are mocked in memory, this is a flow-and-decisions prototype for the ECECD partnership conversation, not a working backend.

What's next

Build the post-claim landing into a real provider dashboard, and wire verification to the actual ECECD registry import.

Back to home